The Editor:
Re: Is Port Moody's land management strategy a 'blueprint' to sell public properties or 'leveraging current assets' to acquire amenities? (June 19, 2024)
Port Moody must not disregard the results and intent of the 2018 referendum where residents clearly expressed their opposition to selling public properties.
Coun. Haven Lurbiecki's concerns reflect the community’s stance on maintaining ownership of city land, which is essential for future amenities such as parks, a larger library and new recreational facilities.
Public land is a shared asset, belonging to all residents, and monetizing these assets typically benefits the private sector more than the public.
Selling off these properties would compromise the community’s long-term interests and result in the loss of spaces vital for communal growth and development.
While some councillors suggest that selling city land is necessary to fund new amenities, this approach ignores the possibility of leveraging existing assets while keeping them under public ownership.
Port Moody’s land management strategy should focus on retaining and improving public properties.
Alternative funding methods that do not involve selling these valuable assets must be explored. The strategy should be adaptable and forward-thinking, safeguarding the needs and wishes of future generations.
In summary, Port Moody should honour the 2018 referendum results and commit to preserving its public properties.
By doing so, the city can ensure the availability of spaces needed to expand amenities and provide long-term benefits to all residents.
Ignoring the community’s clear mandate would not only be undemocratic, but also harmful to the future development and well-being of Port Moody.
- Vern Oster, Port Moody
